Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 17244718 Published · ppublish English

Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results.

Radiology ·Vol. 242 ·No. 3 ·2007-03-27

Sardanelli Francesco, Podo Franca, D'Agnolo Giuliano, Verdecchia Arduino, Santaquilani Mariano, Musumeci Renato, Trecate Giovanna, Manoukian Siranoush, Morassut Sandro, de Giacomi Clelia, Federico Massimo, Cortesi Laura, Corcione Stefano, Cirillo Stefano, Marra Vincenzo, , Cilotti Anna, Di Maggio Cosimo, Fausto Alfonso, Preda Lorenzo, Zuiani Chiara, Contegiacomo Alma, Orlacchio Antonio, Calabrese Massimo, Bonomo Lorenzo, Di Cesare Ernesto, Tonutti Maura, Panizza Pietro, Del Maschio Alessandro

Abstract

To prospectively compare clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography, ultrasonography (US), and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for screening women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer and report interim results, with pathologic findings as standard.,Institutional review board of each center approved the research; informed written consent was obtained. CBE, mammography, US, and MR imaging were performed for yearly screening of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, first-degree relatives of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, or women enrolled because of a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer (three or more events in first- or second-degree relatives in either maternal or paternal line; these included breast cancer in women younger than 60 years, ovarian cancer at any age, and male breast cancer at any age).,Two hundred seventy-eight women (mean age, 46 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]) were enrolled. Breast cancer was found in 11 of 278 women at first round and seven of 99 at second round (14 invasive, four intraductal; eight were <or=10 mm in diameter). Detection rate per year was 4.8% (18 of 377) overall; 4.3% (11 of 258) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and first-degree relatives of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers versus 5.9% (seven of 119) in women enrolled because of strong family history; and 5.3% (nine of 169) in women with previous personal breast and/or ovarian cancer versus 4.3% (nine of 208) in those without. In six (33%) of 18 patients, cancer was detected only with MR imaging. Sensitivity was as follows: CBE, 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29%, 71%); mammography, 59% (95% CI: 36%, 78%); US, 65% (95% CI: 41%, 83%); and MR imaging, 94% (95% CI: 82%, 99%). Positive predictive value was as follows: CBE, 82% (95% CI: 52%, 95%); mammography, 77% (95% CI: 50%, 92%); US, 65% (95% CI: 41%, 83%); and MR imaging, 63% (95% CI: 43%, 79%).,Addition of MR imaging to the screening regimen for high-risk women may enable detection of otherwise unsuspected breast cancers.

Article Info
Journal
Radiology
Abbr.
Radiology
Published
2007-03-27
Indexed
2007-02-27
Updated
2016-11-24
Language
English
Country/Region
United States
NLM ID
0401260
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com