Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 35690095 Published · ppublish English

Current technologies for anti-ENA antibody detection: State-of-the-art of diagnostic immunoassays.

Journal of immunological methods ·Vol. 507 ·2022-00-00

Infantino M, Carbone T, Brusca I, Alessio MG, Previtali G, Platzgummer S, Paura G, Castiglione C, Fabris M, Pesce G, Porcelli B, Terzuoli L, Bacarelli MR, Tampoia M, Cinquanta L, Villalta D, Buzzolini F, Palterer B, Pancani S, Benucci M, Manfredi M, Bizzaro N, Study Group on Autoimmune Diseases of the Italian Society of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Autoantibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and classification of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). In recent years, newly developed methods have enabled the simultaneous and quantitative detection of multiple anti-ENA reactivities. However, data regarding the comparability of results obtained using different technologies across different platforms are scarce. In this study we compared eight different immunoassays, commonly used in current laboratory practice for detection of anti-ENA antibodies. Sixty patients suffering from different SARD, 10 inflammatory arthritis patients (disease controls) and 10 healthy blood donors were included in this comparative study. Sera were collected in 15 centers belonging to the Study Group on Autoimmune Diseases of the Italian Society of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. We evaluated the analytical sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of each method for antibodies to Sm, RNP, Ro60, Ro52, Scl70, CENP-B and Jo1. Cohen's kappa was used to analyze the agreement among methods. Average agreement among methods was 0.82, ranging from substantial (k = 0.72) to almost perfect (k = 0.92). However, while the specificity was very good for all methods, some differences emerged regarding the analytical sensitivity. Diagnostic performance of current technologies for anti-ENA antibody detection showed good comparability. However, as some differences exist among methods, laboratory scientists and clinicians must be aware of the diagnostic accuracy of the testing method in use.

Keywords
Agreement Autoimmune rheumatic diseases Cohen's kappa Diagnostic accuracy ENA Immunologic methods
Article Info
Journal
Journal of immunological methods
Abbr.
J Immunol Methods
ISSN
1872-7905
Published
2022-00-00
Language
English
Country/Region
Netherlands
NLM ID
1305440
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com